| Independence referendum for Falkland Islands | | Print | |
| Written by Demerara Waves |
| Sunday, 20 January 2013 14:05 |
|
The Falkland Islands (Malvinas) government has set March 11- 12 when residents of the British Overseas territory would answer ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ to the question “Do you wish the The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and the Organisation of American States (OAS)- both of which The Falkland Islands Government said that if the vote, to be internationally observed, decides that the territory should be granted independence, another referendum would be held. “Should the majority of votes cast be against the current status, the About half of the territory's 3,000 inhabitants are eligible to cast ballots. The decision to hold the referendum in March was announced on June 18, 2012 by the Falkland Islands government after Under the Falkland Islands Constitution, residents there have a right to self-determination. Currently, the |
| Man allegedly kills father, attempts to bury body Demerara Waves - Thursday, 23 May 2013 by Alva Solomon Residents and police were up to last evening scouring the community of Manawarin in the Region One are... Read more... |
| DPP withdraws case against police murder accused Denis Scott Chabrol - Thursday, 23 May 2013 Shaka Chase hugging a boy and surrounded by family members and well-wishers. Shaka Chase, who was accused of murdering... Read more... |
| Arson attack on Merriman's Funeral Home Denis Scott Chabrol - Thursday, 23 May 2013
Investigators were continuing their probe into an early Thursday morning fire at Merriman’s Funeral Home, Lime and Be... Read more... |
| Opposition unmoved by President Ramotar's plea Kwesi Isles - Wednesday, 22 May 2013 The parliamentary opposition on Wednesday remained unmoved by the unprecedented move by President Donald Ramotar to p... Read more... |
| Anti-Money Laundering Bill: AG Nandlall to "beg" for compliance extension Kwesi Isles - Wednesday, 22 May 2013 ![]() Attorney General Anil Nandlall The Guyana government says it will be looking to secure an extension to later this year... Read more... |
| President Ramotar to join CARICOM Heads in Trinidad for meeting with US Vice President GINA - Wednesday, 22 May 2013
Read more... |
Copyright All Right Reserved @ 2011
Comments
Argentina would volunteer to be that other state, but their rough wooing wont get the islanders agreement. It might be thought that the UK should enter into discussions with Argentina ref sovereignty, but Argentinian law requires that the outcome of any such negotiations must be the assumption of sovereignty by Argentina. So what's the point?
The basis of this Argentinian conviction might well be the pope's allocation to Spain, sometime ago, of all land found on the longitude of the Falklands. Venezuela seems to have cured itself of similar fixations.
LB asks about the Chagos Islanders. A sad tale, one of many scattered about the old British Empire, which included a quarter of all land and practically all the sea. But this one seems to be getting the attention of earnest documentary makers and prosperous lawyers because the beneficiary was that recent new kid on the block, the US of A. However, what's pertinent to this correspondence was that fifty years ago, a population similar in number to that of the Falklands was removed and taken across the Indian Ocean to Mauritius. But the double standards are understandable
Back to 1815. During the Napoleonic Wars,the many French islands had channeled arms and advisers to hostile Indian states, and privateers had disrupted trade. Mauritius and the Seychelles, and a speckle of islands, passed to the UK. In Mauritius, sugar had replaced the Dodo, but the African slaves preferred fishing.
The Chagos Islands were one of the uninhabited specs, off the southern end of the Maldives. Plantations were established, but eventually failed, as did other activities. However, while the distances were mind numbing, the winds are reliable and slavers and pirates had been swept from the sea. Eventually, fisherfolk from Mauritius reached the effectively deserted Chagos. People passed to and fro, families were established, subsistence agriculture practised. While the Chagos were now nominally administered from Mauritius, not the Seychelles, taxes,teachers, doctors were absent. The squatters had no rights to land or water, but this didn't matter as nobody minded. Until the USA decided it needed an Indian Ocean base.It can be imagined that the Whiz kid officials in London and Washington had well advanced plans before the squatters were noticed, but new airfields,dams, and urban redevelopments routinely caused more disruption. And what compensation could be offered to squatters without getting the auditors on your head?
The Chagos islanders might have been expected to return to the Mauritian fishing community they were familiar with.But they hadn't left because life was easy, and Indians, brought in as indentured labourers to work the sugar cane, now owned the land and businesses. Fishing, poisoned by agricultural run-off and effluent from coastal development, had collapsed.The workless African fishermen now had to accommodate the Chagos Islanders. The British government finally recognised the small scale mess up it had been party to, but money directed to the islanders was intercepted by the Mauritian government to pay for all its expenses. A second lump got through.
So what will be the eventual outcome?Mauritius will 'recover' the Chagos in 21 years, and be absorbed by India in 22years.
The fishing community will relocate to Reunion.
The Chagos islanders will be long settled in the UK. But a couple will have returned to fishing-in Falkland waters.
RSS feed for comments to this post